Zero Tolerance Free Essays - PhDessay.com.
Sparked by President Bill Clinton’s Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, the “zero tolerance” policy has discouraged and punished students who hinder learning in schools by fighting, using profane words, disobeying rules, and bringing drugs, alcohol, and weapons to school.
Zero Tolerance: Doubtful Indeed Many schools around the country have been faced with violence and even actual deaths. Take the incident at Columbine, for example. Many schools for this very reason have proposed and in some cases even imposed a policy called, The Zero Tolerance Policy.
Zero-tolerance policies punish all offenses severely, no matter how minor. School systems began adopting the tough codes after Congress passed the 1994 Gun-Free Schools Act, which required one-year expulsions for any child bringing a firearm or bomb to school.
Zero-tolerance policing is a strategy that weakens the relationship between police and civilians and is thus expected not to have a positive effect in reducing crime. So, the prophecy of criminality fulfills itself as a consequence of the labeling process.
Zero tolerance is a policy which was brought about enforcing school safety more firmly, and aimed to better protect students. However, the way in which these students are protected is highly debatable, making the zero tolerance ideology very controversial. Exactly which approach is most effective in protecting a student, let alone, thousands?
Zero Tolerance Essay .Will Pearson 1 Social Problems Zero Tolerance Shouldn’t Be Tolerated In September of 1997 a nine year old boy handed out Certs Mints in class. He was subsequently suspended from school for possession and distribution of “look-alike” drugs and was interviewed by a police officer (Skiba, Peterson 1999).
Zero Tolerance policing aims to stop serious crime by clamping down on the minor crimes like graffiti that the practitioners believe lead to further crimes and using custodial sentences for first offences. It includes set responses to particular crimes by the police although the courts maintain some discretion.
In this essay the author will explore and critically evaluate harm reduction in drug rehabilitation versus zero tolerance approaches, with reference to public policy issues in drug use.
Zero tolerance is driven by the educational philosophy, policies, and practices of school communities. Stakeholders expect schools to be a safe place for staff and for students.
A zero-tolerance policy has been ineffective seeing as a student 's behavior never gets dealt with and what tends to happen is the situation will just get out of hand and end with a child being taken out of school. This is where a PBIS system needs to be implemented.
Zero-tolerance policies used in public schools across the United States have been in affect for years now, and have failed to produce the intended results. All to often the method fails to differentiate between good students who make the typical mistakes of adolescence and the unruly delinquents w.
Zero Tolerance for College Students Gladwell stated in, “No Mercy” (2006), “this is the age of zero tolerance.” Zero tolerance policies, which are regulations for specific issues such as weapons, drugs, cheating and alcohol, are adopted by many schools and workplaces today.
The zero tolerance policy strives to reduce violence in schools and make schools a safer place for students. Anne Atkinson, a member of the Virginia Board of Education defines zero tolerance as a “policy that mandates predetermined consequences or punishments for specified offenses.”.
